Safety Culture

Published on 21 May 2007 by andrewskegg in presentations, risk & safety

0

“Organisational culture” seems to be an elusive concept that evades strict definition and identification, yet we all know what the culture is in any organisation we encounter and can describe its characteristics. A subset of “organisational culture” is “safety culture”, which is not immune to the same vagaries and adds another layer of abstractions.
Given the difficulties in describing and defining an organisations culture, one might expect it to be difficult to identify its origins and subsequently determine strategies for change. Many practitioners in the field of conclude that:

“Since culture is defined as ‘the collective belief of the group’, then we must change the beliefs of the individuals that comprise that group in order to change the culture”.

Changing the core personal values and beliefs of adults is extremely difficult, takes a long time and can cost an enormous amount of money. A sustained, conscious, deliberate effort must be maintained in order to embed the new behaviour expected and prevent a relapse to the old ways. Furthermore, such efforts are undermined by the forced requirement to concentrate on small groups of people in turn, making it very difficult to effect a tsunami sized sea-change.
The problem is the logic of the model is incomplete which undermines the entire process. What is missing from the is *why* those beliefs came into being and *how* they are persisted within the organisational systems. Schien (1992:12) says culture is:

“… a pattern of shared basic assumptions that the group learned as it solved problems … that has worked well enough to be considered valid … and taught to new members as the correct way to perceive, think and feel”

The implication here is that by breaking the validations used to perpetuate the rules we will shift beliefs about the system itself. This provides a shortcut to cultural change - change the what is expected of the workforce and you will change the culture. Schein(1992:231) says it in this way:

“Leaders create culture by what they systematically pay attention to.”

I agree; If you change the Key Performance Indicators, you will change the performance and you will eventually change the beliefs (although, this is not that important). I recently gave a presentation to a safety group in Smithton covering this subject, which I have attached for your reference. Let me know what you think….
Safety Culture.ppt 14Mb Power Point file

Continue Reading

0

In Brian Green’s book “The Elegant Universe” he describes two views of the universe; one that deals with Newton’s laws of gravity and Einstein’s theory of relativity, and the vanishingly small world of quantum physics. The two models seem correct in their given context, but both cannot be right as they have fundamental and irreconcilable differences.That got me thinking about the world of safety. On one hand we have large scale measures like the Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (the value of which will be a topic of a future article), lost man hours, insurance premiums, legal fines and environmental costs. At the other end of the scale we use things like job safety analysis, standard operating procedures, permits to work or just plain common sense. I don’t believe the two views are compatible in the same way gravity and quantum physics are not compatible.

Opponents will point out that the large measures are emergent properties of what happens “at the coal face”. Good operating procedures and permits to work result in lower LTIFRs and reduced injuries, but I have yet to see a single report that successfully correlates anything with the fluctuations in LTIFRs.

The truth is there is a superstring that explains all these things. All these measures are emergent properties of a deeper truth – energy causes damage. In order for injury, disease, plant damage, lost productivity or environmental damage to occur an exchange of energy must occur.

Using deceptively simple methodologies we can identify the potentially damaging energies, examine the controls present over those energies, their likelihood of failure and the potential consequences.These do not need to be big, expensive and difficult to use tools, yet they result in astounding results. Have a look at the presentation and give us some feedback.

Superstrings of Safety (6,757KB PDF)

Continue Reading